Collaborative Governance Mechanisms for Multimodal Freight Hubs in Double Landlocked Countries: Evidence from Uzbekistan

Authors

  • Mu Zhendi University of Tourism and Cultural Heritage, University Boulevard, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i2.1171

Keywords:

Double Landlocked Countries, Multimodal Transport, Freight Hub Governance, Virtual Port Coordination, Belt and Road Initiative

Abstract

As a double landlocked country, Uzbekistan has long faced development bottlenecks of high transit logistics costs and low turnover efficiency. Based on the study of eight core multimodal freight hubs in Uzbekistan, this paper adopts a combination of DEA efficiency evaluation and panel regression analysis to systematically analyze the core influencing factors of hub operation efficiency. The study finds that the improvement effect of collaborative governance mechanisms on hub efficiency is significantly better than that of infrastructure expansion alone. Three types of governance measures, namely pre-clearance authorization, integrated management, and information platform, can jointly drive an efficiency increase of 35%, while the effect of infrastructure expansion is only 3%. The study also finds that the customs clearance time for double transit is 2.57 times that of single transit, showing a significant nonlinear superposition characteristic. The conclusions of this study can provide practical and implementable references for the hub construction and operation optimization of the China-Central Asia Corridor under the Belt and Road Initiative.

References

J.-F. Arvis, G. Raballand, C. Willoughby, and R. Carruthers, Connecting Landlocked Developing Countries to Markets: Trade Corridors in the 21st Century. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2011.

J.-F. Arvis, G. Raballand, and J.-F. Marteau, The Cost of Being Landlocked: Logistics Costs and Supply Chain Reliability. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2007.

M. L. Faye, J. W. McArthur, J. D. Sachs, and T. Snow, “The challenges facing landlocked developing countries,” J. Hum. Dev., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–68, 2004.

B. Behdani, B. Wiegmans, and V. Roso, “Port-hinterland transport and logistics: Emerging trends and frontier research,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 161–186, 2020.

T. Notteboom and J.-P. Rodrigue, “Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port development,” Marit. Policy Manage., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 297–313, 2005.

V. Roso, J. Woxenius, and K. Lumsden, “The dry port concept: Connecting container seaport with the hinterland,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 338–345, 2009.

J. Monios and G. Wilmsmeier, “Giving a direction to port regionalisation,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1551–1561, 2012.

E. Sdoukopoulos and M. Boile, “Port-hinterland concept evolution: A critical review,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 87, Art. no. 102815, 2020.

C. Ansell and A. Gash, “Collaborative governance in theory and practice,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 543–571, 2008.

K. Emerson, T. Nabatchi, and S. Balogh, “An integrative framework for collaborative governance,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2012.

X. Wang, Y. D. Wong, and K. F. Yuen, “Transport research under Belt and Road Initiative: Current trends and future research agenda,” Transp. Rev., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 208–231, 2021.

X. Wang and J. Sarkis, “Managing supply chain uncertainty and risk through governance and digitalization,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 232, Art. no. 107940, 2021.

E. Krmac and M. Mansouri Kaleibar, “A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology in port efficiency evaluation,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2023.

A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the efficiency of decision making units,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978.

R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis,” Manage. Sci., vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092, 1984.

C. Kunaka and R. Carruthers, Trade and Transport Corridor Management Toolkit. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2014.

World Bank, Uzbekistan: Building Blocks for Integrated Transport and Logistics Development. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Group, 2023.

T. Notteboom and H. E. Haralambides, “Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: Quo vadis?,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 329–352, 2020.

M. Heinbach, G. Wilmsmeier, and J. Monios, “Digitalization and governance in port–hinterland logistics systems,” Marit. Econ. Logist., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 391–410, 2022.

A. Moros-Daza, J. Monios, and G. Wilmsmeier, “Port governance and hinterland integration: A multi-level perspective,” Marit. Policy Manage., vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 879–896, 2020.

J. Tongzon, “Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 107–122, 2001.

G. Wilmsmeier and J. Monios, “Institutional structure and agency in the governance of spatial diversification of port system evolution in Latin America,” J. Transp. Geogr., vol. 51, pp. 294–307, 2016.

R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

Zhendi, M. . (2026). Collaborative Governance Mechanisms for Multimodal Freight Hubs in Double Landlocked Countries: Evidence from Uzbekistan. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, 7(2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i2.1171

Issue

Section

Articles