Assessing Investment Efficiency Across Districts of Namangan Region

Authors

  • Behzodbek B. Ibrohimov Independent researcher, Urgench State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i2.1221

Keywords:

Investment Efficiency, Strategic Impact, Regional Development, Namangan Region, Investment Allocation, DEA, Spatial Economics, Infrastructure, Institutional Factors, Economic Growth, Regional Disparities, Resource Utilization

Abstract

The study examines the efficiency and strategic impact of investment resource utilization in Namangan Region, focusing on spatial disparities and resource allocation effectiveness across districts. The primary objective is to assess how investment processes influence regional economic development and to identify key factors determining their efficiency. The research applies a mixed methodological approach, combining Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to evaluate relative efficiency and comparative analysis to explore strategic investment models. Empirical evidence indicates that despite significant growth in investment volumes over recent years, their distribution remains uneven, leading to variations in economic outcomes across districts. The findings highlight that infrastructure development, institutional quality, and market accessibility play a critical role in enhancing investment efficiency and maximizing strategic impact. The study proposes a differentiated (place-based) investment policy framework aimed at improving resource allocation and fostering balanced regional development in Namangan Region.

References

M. P. Todaro and S. C. Smith, Economic Development. Pearson Education, 2020.

World Bank, World Development Report: Finance for an Equitable Recovery. Washington, DC, 2022.

OECD, Regional Development Policy: Principles and Practices. Paris, 2021.

UNDP, Human Development Report. New York, 2023.

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Decree on the Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan. Tashkent, 2022.

A. O. Hirschman, The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.

R. J. Barro and X. Sala-i-Martin, Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.

N. G. Mankiw, D. Romer, and D. N. Weil, “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 407–437, 1992.

P. Krugman, Geography and Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.

M. Fujita and J.-F. Thisse, Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

D. C. North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

D. Acemoglu and J. A. Robinson, Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown Business, 2012.

M. E. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press, 1990.

M. J. Farrell, “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, vol. 120, no. 3, pp. 253–290, 1957.

A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 429–444, 1978.

R. D. Banker, A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 1078–1092, 1984.

L. Simar and P. W. Wilson, “Estimation and Inference in Two-Stage, Semi-Parametric Models of Production Processes,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 31–64, 2007.

A. Afonso and M. S. Aubyn, “Cross-country Efficiency of Public Sector Performance: A Semi-Parametric Analysis,” Economic Modelling, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 476–491, 2006.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-03

How to Cite

Ibrohimov, B. B. (2026). Assessing Investment Efficiency Across Districts of Namangan Region. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, 7(2), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i2.1221

Issue

Section

Articles