From Formal Adoption to Professional Practice: Professionalization and the Implementation Absorption Gap in Uzbekistan’s Audit Reform

Authors

  • Otabek O. Barakayev Head of the Department of Accounting Methodology and Regulation of Auditing Activity, Ministry of Economy and Finance of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i3.1295

Keywords:

Professionalization, implementation absorption gap, audit reform, Uzbekistan, ISA adoption, normative capacity, transition economy

Abstract

This article examines the professionalization challenge underlying audit reform in Uzbekistan and develops the concept of the implementation absorption gap to explain the divergence between rapid formal adoption of international standards and slower substantive internalization in practice. Although Uzbekistan has moved quickly to align its auditing framework with international requirements through legal reform, ISA adoption, certification modernization, digital monitoring, and external quality assurance procedures, the deeper professional foundations required for effective implementation remain uneven. Drawing on documentary analysis and official audit market indicators, the study demonstrates that the key constraint in the Uzbek case is not the absence of regulation but the incomplete development of normative capacity: professional judgment, skepticism, training depth, continuing professional development, international integration, and firm-level learning culture. The evidence shows that international certifications remain limited to a minority of practitioners, international network participation is concentrated in a narrow segment of firms, audit activity is heavily concentrated in Tashkent, and small and medium-sized practices face disproportionate adjustment pressures. The article contributes to the literature by moving beyond a simple “successful convergence” narrative and by offering the implementation absorption gap as an analytical concept for understanding why formal institutional reform can outpace professional internalization in state-led transition economies. The findings suggest that the next phase of reform should prioritize professional education, mentoring, interpretive guidance, and capability-building mechanisms rather than further regulatory expansion alone.

References

N. Albu, C. N. Albu, and D. Alexander, “When global accounting standards meet the local context: Insights from an emerging economy,” Critical Perspectives on Accounting, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 489–510, 2014.

S. E. Bonner, “Experience effects in auditing: The role of task-specific knowledge,” The Accounting Review, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 72–92, 1990.

R. K. Hurtt, “Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 149–171, 2010.

M. S. Larson, The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press, 1977.

R. Libby and J. Luft, “Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 425–450, 1993.

R. W. McGee, Accounting Reform in Transition and Developing Economies. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2008.

A. Mennicken, “From inspection to auditing: Audit and markets as linked ecologies,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 334–359, 2010.

M. W. Nelson, “A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing,” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1–34, 2009.

M. Nurunnabi, “Auditors’ perceptions of the implementation of International Standards on Auditing in a developing country,” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 2–27, 2017.

W. R. Scott, Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014.

T. Soobaroyen, M. Tsamenyi, and H. Sapra, “Accounting and auditing reforms in Africa: Insights, lessons, and future directions,” Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 413–427, 2017.

R. K. Yin, Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

Normative-Legal Sources

Republic of Uzbekistan, Law on Auditing Activity of the Republic of Uzbekistan, No. LRU-677, Feb. 25, 2021.

Republic of Uzbekistan, Law on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts, No. LRU-815, Jan. 20, 2023.

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “On Measures for Further Development of Auditing Activity in the Republic of Uzbekistan,” Presidential Decree No. PD-3946, Sept. 19, 2018.

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “On Additional Measures for Improving the Auditor Certification System,” Presidential Decree No. PD-5210, Aug. 4, 2021.

President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “On Measures for Improving the Financial Accounting System in Accordance with International Requirements and Standards,” Presidential Decree No. PD-282, Sept. 15, 2025.

Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “On Approval of the Regulation on the Procedure for Recognizing International Standards on Auditing for Application in the Republic of Uzbekistan,” Resolution No. 171, Apr. 11, 2022.

Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “On Approval of the Regulation on the Procedure for External Quality Assurance of Audit Organizations,” Resolution No. 538, Sept. 28, 2022.

Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan, “On Approval of the Administrative Regulation for Inclusion of Audit Organizations in the Registry,” Resolution No. 387, Aug. 15, 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-03

How to Cite

Barakayev, O. O. (2026). From Formal Adoption to Professional Practice: Professionalization and the Implementation Absorption Gap in Uzbekistan’s Audit Reform. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, 7(3), 207–213. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i3.1295

Issue

Section

Articles