Technological Modernization as a First-Order Driver of Competitiveness in Transition Economy Electrotechnical Industries: Panel Evidence from Uzbekistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i3.1301Keywords:
Competitiveness, technological modernization, electrotechnical industry, PLS-SEM, total factor productivity, Uzbekistan, transition economyAbstract
This study examines the mechanisms through which technological modernization and innovation capacity influence the competitiveness of electrotechnical industry enterprises in Uzbekistan, a lower-middle-income transition economy. Drawing on panel data from 150 enterprises over the period 2018–2023, the study employs Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Levinsohn-Petrin total factor productivity (TFP) estimation to test a sequencing hypothesis: that in below-threshold transition economies, technological modernization constitutes the dominant first-order predictor of firm-level competitiveness, whereas innovation capacity becomes statistically significant only after a baseline modernization threshold has been crossed. Results confirm that technological modernization (β = 0.487, p < 0.001) exerts the strongest direct effect on the competitiveness composite, while innovation capacity fails to reach conventional significance (β = 0.139, p = 0.062) for the full sample. Subgroup analysis reveals that innovation capacity becomes a significant predictor (β = 0.312, p = 0.004) exclusively among firms that have surpassed the modernization threshold. Human capital partially mediates the modernization–competitiveness path, and institutional support moderates this relationship. The findings carry implications for industrial policy sequencing in post-Soviet manufacturing economies and contribute to the evolutionary economics literature on technological catch-up.
References
A. K. Tulaboev, “Problems and prospects of electrotechnical industry development in Uzbekistan,” Economics and Finance (Uzbekistan), no. 4, pp. 32–41, 2021.
M. E. Porter, The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 1990.
J. Cantwell, “Innovation and competitiveness,” in The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson, Eds. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 543–567.
J. Fagerberg and M. Srholec, “National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development,” Research Policy, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1417–1435, 2008.
F. Castellacci, “Closing the technology gap?” Review of Development Economics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 180–197, 2011.
World Bank, Uzbekistan: Toward a Prosperous and Inclusive Future – Systematic Country Diagnostic Update. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank, 2023.
K. Aiginger and J. Vogel, “Competitiveness: From a misleading concept to a strategy supporting beyond-GDP goals,” Competitiveness Review, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 497–523, 2015.
M. Bell and K. Pavitt, “Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 157–210, 1993.
L. Kim, Imitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning. Boston, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
S. Lall, Competitiveness, Technology and Skills. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2001.
G. Abdurakhmanova, A. Kayumov, and B. Islamov, “Industrial modernization and structural transformation in Uzbekistan,” Central Asian Survey, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 412–430, 2022.
UNDP, Industrial Policy for Sustainable Development in Central Asia. New York, NY, USA: United Nations Development Programme, 2023.
State Committee of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Statistics, Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Uzbekistan. Tashkent, Uzbekistan: Stat.uz, 2024.
C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, and J.-M. Becker, SmartPLS 4. Oststeinbek, Germany: SmartPLS GmbH, 2022.
J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” European Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019.
J. Levinsohn and A. Petrin, “Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables,” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 317–341, 2003.
T. J. Coelli, D. S. P. Rao, C. J. O’Donnell, and G. E. Battese, An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2005.
K. Lee, Schumpeterian Analysis of Economic Catch-Up: Knowledge, Path-Creation, and the Middle-Income Trap. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
B. E. Hansen, “Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference,” Journal of Econometrics, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 345–368, 1999.
A. H. Amsden, The Rise of the Rest: Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001.
R. Hausmann, J. Hwang, and D. Rodrik, “What you export matters,” Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–25, 2007.
N. Kaldor, Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1966.
R. R. Nelson, “Economic development from the perspective of evolutionary economic theory,” Oxford Development Studies, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2008.
UNIDO, Industrial Development Report 2022: The Future of Industrialization in a Post-Pandemic World. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2022.
S. Zhu and X. Fu, “Drivers of export upgrading,” World Development, vol. 51, pp. 221–234, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- The publication has been approved by the author(s) and by responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or edit it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
