Personal Income Tax Revenue Allocation to District and City Budgets: A Regional Panel Data Econometric Study

Authors

  • Imanova Umida Baxtiyorovna Doctoral student of the Academy of Public Policy and Administration under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, PhD

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i3.1322

Keywords:

fiscal decentralization, personal income tax, panel data, fixed effects, Uzbekistan, local budget reform, difference-in-differences, JEL Classification, H71, H77, C23, O18

Abstract

Background: Fiscal decentralization theory predicts that assigning tax revenues to subnational governments enhances allocative efficiency and promotes local economic development. Uzbekistan enacted Law No. ORQ-1011 in December 2024, mandating that at least 50% of personal income tax (PIT) receipts — excluding large taxpayer contributions — be transferred to district and city budgets.

Objective: This study empirically evaluates the effectiveness of this normative reform using district-level PIT revenue data and a suite of panel-data econometric methods.

Methods: A balanced panel of 84 districts over 2017–2025 (N=711 observations) was analyzed using Pooled OLS, Random Effects (RE), and Fixed Effects (FE) estimators, complemented by first-difference (FD) analysis and pre/post comparisons via Welch t-test and Mann–Whitney U-test.

Results: FE estimates show a stable annual log-growth of 32.5% (β=0.325, p<0.001) throughout 2017–2025. The first-difference analysis for 2024–2025 reveals a mean log-change of +0.394 (≈+48.2%), significant at p<0.001. The 2025 growth rate exceeded the pre-policy average by +23.8 percentage points (Welch t=2.58, p=0.011; Mann–Whitney p<0.001). Positive growth was observed in 81.9% of districts.

Conclusions: The evidence strongly supports that the 2025 policy intervention produced a statistically significant and geographically widespread increase in district-level PIT revenues, providing a sound empirical basis for the proposed 50% allocation mechanism.

References

C. M. Tiebout, “A pure theory of local expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 416–424, 1956.

R. A. Musgrave, The Theory of Public Finance. McGraw-Hill, 1959.

W. E. Oates, Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1972.

K. S. Birditt, L. A. Tighe, M. R. Nevitt, and S. H. Zarit, “Daily social interactions and the biological stress response: Are there age differences in links between social interactions and alpha-amylase?,” Gerontologist, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 1114–1125, 2018.

R. Bahl and J. Linn, Urban Public Finance in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press, 1992.

A. Yilmaz, “Vermicompost enhances salinetolerance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.),” BSJ Agric, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2023.

T. Zhang and H. Zou, “Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China,” J. Public Econ., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 221–240, 1998.

N. Akai and M. Sakata, “Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States,” J. Urban Econ., vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 93–108, 2002.

A. Iimi, “Decentralization and economic growth revisited: An empirical note,” J. Urban Econ., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 449–461, 2005.

J. Martinez-Vazquez and R. M. McNab, “Fiscal decentralization and economic growth,” World Dev., vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 1597–1616, 2003.

U. Thiessen, “Fiscal decentralisation and economic growth in high-income OECD countries,” Fisc. Stud., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 237–274, 2003.

Á. Fernández-López, M. J. Rodríguez-Fórtiz, M. L. Rodríguez-Almendros, and M. J. Martínez-Segura, “Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs,” Comput. Educ., 2013.

A. Rodriguez-Pose and R. Ezcurra, “Does decentralization matter for regional disparities? A cross-country analysis,” J. Econ. Geogr., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 619–644, 2010.

J.-P. Faguet, “Decentralization and governance,” World Dev., vol. 53, pp. 2–13, 2014.

S. Yilmaz, “The impact of fiscal decentralization on macroeconomic performance,” in Proceedings of the 92nd Annual Conference on Taxation, National Tax Association, 2000.

J. M. Wooldridge, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 2nd ed. MIT Press, 2010.

D. Stansel, “Local decentralization and local economic growth: A cross-sectional examination of US metropolitan areas,” J. Urban Econ., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 55–72, 2005.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-20

How to Cite

Baxtiyorovna, I. U. . (2026). Personal Income Tax Revenue Allocation to District and City Budgets: A Regional Panel Data Econometric Study. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, 7(3), 421–428. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i3.1322

Issue

Section

Articles