Ai-Enabled Environmental Monitoring as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Jsc “Uzbekcoal”

Authors

  • Mirabbos Mira’loevich Murataev Independent Researcher (PhD), Higher School of Business and Entrepreneurship under the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, environmental monitoring, Internet of Things, coal mining, corporate social responsibility, ESG, particulate matter, digital transformation

Abstract

This study evaluates the economic, environmental, and social implications of deploying artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled environmental monitoring stations at JSC “Uzbekcoal”, Uzbekistan’s principal coal producer. The case study integrates company environmental and production records with a structured before–after assessment, an environmental performance index, a corporate social responsibility (CSR) linkage model, and a cost–benefit framework. The proposed architecture combines Internet of Things sensors, edge validation, a centralized data platform, and AI-supported anomaly detection and forecasting. Company records associated with the monitoring initiative indicate a 44.5% reduction in environmental penalties, a 20–25% reduction in harmful emissions, and an estimated reduction of up to 20% in adverse environmental exposure affecting nearby communities. These values are interpreted as case-specific operational outcomes rather than universal causal effects because the available dataset does not support randomized attribution. The analysis shows how continuous measurement can convert environmental management from periodic compliance reporting into a preventive decision system: exceedances are detected earlier, mitigation resources are targeted more precisely, and auditable data improve stakeholder transparency. Economically, avoided penalties, lower incident-response expenditure, resource savings, and reduced downtime constitute the principal benefit channels. Socially, improved exposure control, disclosure, and grievance responsiveness strengthen the environmental and social dimensions of CSR. The paper proposes a phased implementation roadmap that emphasizes sensor co-location and calibration, data governance, human oversight, cybersecurity, and alignment with ISO 26000 and ESG reporting. The study contributes an applied evaluation framework for AI-enabled environmental governance in coal-mining enterprises in emerging economies.

References

World Health Organization, WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2021.

H. R. Bowen, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York, NY, USA: Harper & Brothers, 1953.

A. B. Carroll, “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders,” Business Horizons, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 39–48, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G.

M. E. Porter and M. R. Kramer, “Creating shared value,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, no. 1–2, pp. 62–77, 2011.

G. Friede, T. Busch, and A. Bassen, “ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2,000 empirical studies,” Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 210–233, 2015, doi: 10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917.

D. B. Olawade, O. Z. Wada, A. O. Ige, B. I. Egbewole, A. Olojo, and B. I. Oladapo, “Artificial intelligence in environmental monitoring: Advancements, challenges, and future directions,” Hygiene and Environmental Health Advances, vol. 12, Art. no. 100114, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heha.2024.100114.

P. Dey, S. K. Chaulya, and S. Kumar, “Hybrid CNN-LSTM and IoT-based coal mine hazards monitoring and prediction system,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 152, pp. 249–263, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.06.005.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Enhanced Air Sensor Guidebook. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: U.S. EPA, Office of Research and Development, 2022.

C. C. Corrigan and S. A. Ikonnikova, “A review of the use of AI in the mining industry: Insights and ethical considerations for multi-objective optimization,” The Extractive Industries and Society, vol. 17, Art. no. 101440, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2024.101440.

International Organization for Standardization, ISO 26000:2010—Guidance on Social Responsibility. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2010.

Republic of Uzbekistan, Decree of the President No. PF-5863: Concept of Environmental Protection of the Republic of Uzbekistan until 2030. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2019.

Republic of Uzbekistan, Decree of the President No. PF-60: Development Strategy of New Uzbekistan for 2022–2026. Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 2022.

A. Kaginalkar, S. Kumar, P. Gargava, and D. Niyogi, “Review of urban computing in air quality management as smart city service: An integrated IoT, AI, and cloud technology perspective,” Urban Climate, vol. 39, Art. no. 100972, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100972.

Global Reporting Initiative, GRI 305: Emissions 2016. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Global Reporting Initiative, 2016.

N. Kshetri, “Blockchain and sustainable supply chain management in developing countries,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 60, Art. no. 102376, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102376.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

Murataev, M. M. (2026). Ai-Enabled Environmental Monitoring as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from Jsc “Uzbekcoal”. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, 7(4), 164–172. Retrieved from https://cajitmf.casjournal.org/index.php/CAJITMF/article/view/1348

Issue

Section

Articles