Institutional-Indicator Approach to Assessing the Effectiveness of Regional Innovation Policy

  • Sanjar Ganiev Researcher of Namangan State Technical University
Keywords: regional innovation policy, efficiency, indicator approach, institutional coherence, Regional Innovation Ecosystem (RIE), IHI index, governance quality, innovation infrastructure, economic sustainability, innovation activity, scientific potential

Abstract

This article analyzes the institutional-indicator approach to assessing the effectiveness of regional innovation policy from a scientific, theoretical and practical perspective. The study is based on a comparison of mechanisms for measuring the effectiveness of innovation policy in Uzbekistan and international experience for the period 2010–2024. The article highlights the advantages of the indicator approach, that is, its role in monitoring regional policy as a comprehensive assessment system that combines economic, institutional and social factors. The concept of the “Institutional Coherence Index (IHI)” is also developed, through which the effectiveness of innovation policy in Namangan region is analyzed based on empirical data. The results of the study show that the indicator approach allows us to determine not only economic growth, but also the interrelationship between scientific potential, technological infrastructure and the management system. This methodology allows us to comprehensively take into account institutional factors in addition to traditional economic indicators when assessing innovation policy.

References

C. Freeman, Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter, 1987.

B. A. Lundvall, National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Anthem Press, 2016.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock – Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Growth. New York, 2023.

European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard Report 2023. Brussels, 2023.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Regional Innovation Policy Framework: Enhancing Place-Based Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.

R. R. Nelson, National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.

B. A. Lundvall, National Systems of Innovation: Toward a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Anthem Press, 2016.

OECD, Measuring Innovation in OECD Regions: Indicators for Regional Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011; 2023.

P. Cooke, “Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 945–974, 2001.

B. T. Asheim and A. Isaksen, “Regional Innovation Systems: The Integration of Local ‘Sticky’ and Global ‘Ubiquitous’ Knowledge,” Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2002.

D. Doloreux and S. Parto, “Regional Innovation Systems: Current Discourse and Unresolved Issues,” Technology in Society, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 133–153, 2005.

European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard Report 2023. Brussels, 2023.

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Human Development Report 2023: Breaking the Gridlock – Innovation and Resilience for Sustainable Growth. New York, 2023.

World Bank, Innovation and Competitiveness Report: Global Insights for Emerging Economies. Washington, DC, 2022.

Ministry of Innovative Development of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Methodological Guide for Assessing the Effectiveness of Regional Innovation Policy. Tashkent, 2023.

Published
2025-11-05
How to Cite
Ganiev, S. (2025). Institutional-Indicator Approach to Assessing the Effectiveness of Regional Innovation Policy. Central Asian Journal of Innovations on Tourism Management and Finance, 7(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.51699/cajitmf.v7i1.1056
Section
Articles